Due to lack of data online, I had to stop this.Made Post here.
At a non-discounted price, other monitors with higher brightness, much more accurate color screen, more swivel/tilt options, more ports, higher refresh rate are only a bit more expensive and like the Acer's own Acer Nitro XV272U for about 25% more or ₹3k more. That's not much if you take into account the years you will use it for.
The only reason to pickup this monitor is you get it for very cheap. Right now it says ₹12.5k but with card discount and during sale it might be very close to ₹10k and that's where you should consider it because there are better monitors at a few more thousand rupees already.
This should be quite obvious but if your budget is higher then prefer getting other monitors with higher brightness, 100% DCI-P3 and better build and of course higher refresh rate. This is monitor only if you're tight on budget.
IPS monitors (not mini-led or non-local dimming ones) only have a contrast ratio of around 1000:1 and the advertised 100million:1 contrast ratio is a straight up lie. One review said it's 1500:1 which is slightly better than standard.
It can accept HDR10 signal but it's not really HDR. With barely 250nits and 1500:1 contrast ratio and no local dimming zones, it's simply not correct.
1ms is bascially false.
Extra costs that you might have to pay later.
Total: ₹3000 $50 £40 are too much and puts the whole "cheapest 1440p monitor" into :
Even though HDMI 2.0 supports 1440p@120Hz and 1440p@120Hz HDR with 4:2:0 subsampling, it requires a good quality HDMI cable that has sufficient capacity to do the same.
Some reviews point to the fact that it might not have good quality HDMI cable so keep the cost of those in mind.